If you wanna deregulate, you gotta regulate |
The only newsletter that scans and analyzes the full breadth of regulatory developments every day. Written and curated by Todd Davenport for SourceMedia. 7.5.17 - The Fourth of July, a time to celebrate stars and stripes, founding fathers, mom and apple pie, and the Declaration of Independence. Also, possibly, the Administrative Procedure Act. A federal appeals court ruled on Monday that the Environmental Protection Agency could not simply undo, or even postpone, that which has been done, finding that its attempt to delay a regulatory rulemaking on methane was unlawful. The regulatory rulemaking process is not a much-loved one, but Monday's ruling is a reminder of the intended semi-permanence of what the process yields. Rulemaking is methodical by design and intent. The Washington Post said in its lead that the ruling "could set back the Trump administration’s broad legal strategy for rolling back Obama-era rules." Just as the EPA can't simply roll back the methane rule by regulatory fiat, the Federal Reserve Board can't roll back the Volcker rule. Or the Department of Labor and the fiduciary rule. Secretary of Labor Alexander Acosta has no great love for the fiduciary rule, but as he explained several weeks ago in a Wall Street Journal editorial, he is — for now — bound to implement it. He disagreed with those who characterized the process as "red tape." The rulemaking process "is what ensures that agency heads do not act on whims, but rather only after considering the views of all Americans," he wrote. "Admittedly, this means deregulation must find its way through the thicket of law. Casting aside the thicket, however, would leave Americans vulnerable to regulatory whim." Indeed, the appeals court noted in its Monday opinion that there are, in fact, ways to change the rules. "Agencies obviously have broad discretion to reconsider a regulation at any time," the court wrote. "To do so, however, they must comply with the Administrative Procedure Act, including its requirements for notice and comment." This ruling does not prevent federal agencies from exercising their authority about what to enforce and how; some deregulation can be accomplished through lack of interest in regulating. But the force of that strategy lasts only as long as the tenure of the regulatory heads, and can be further eroded by private litigants pressing courts to offer remedies that regulators themselves are reluctant to provide. Making changes stickier requires rulemaking under the APA. To deregulate, you have to regulate. Like what you've just read? Get it in your inbox first-thing every morning. Today’s Key Reads Many firms clueless on how to prepare for GDPR Morgan Stanley credited with $30M of consumer relief Groups ask MSRB to broaden CUSIP exception for private placements Extra Credit Wall Street Journal - Inside the White House’s policy-making juggernaut China to Hold High-Level Meeting Aimed at Streamlining Financial Regulation SEC settles fraud charges against defunct for-profit college company ITT |